Cortex Global

Prepare your students for careers in STEM+ with Cortex Global

Deliver expert-level exam grading and personalised feedback at a fraction of the cost and time. Help teachers assign more practice, increase A-Level performance, and prepare students for top universities worldwide.

Examiner-level
grading quality
Personalised
feedback
£0.10–£0.30
per exercise
For schools
and sixth forms
Cortex Global exam grading examples
Exam grading for modern schools

Expert-level grading in hours at a fraction of the cost

Cortex Global allows schools to assign significantly more practice work without increasing marking workload. From A-Level practice exercises to full mock examinations, schools can deliver high-quality feedback quickly, consistently, and affordably.

Free teachers from repetitive marking while giving students more chances to improve before final examinations.

£0.10–£0.30
per practice exercise

Affordable at department and whole-school scale.

Hours
instead of weeks

Fast feedback cycles after mocks and practice work.

More
mock exams

More practice without expanding marking load.

Every
student receives feedback

Structured guidance for the next attempt.

Real assessment examples

Built for the subjects and exam standards your school already uses

Cortex Global supports both major exam boards with expert grading across STEM and other subjects.

Pearson
Cambridge

Math

Math student work example

Examiner comments

  • Part (a) is correct. Spelling is not penalised here because the sampling method is clearly identifiable.

  • Part (b) is correct: you recognised that missing data explains the N/a entries.

  • !

    Part (c) uses the wrong standard deviation formula. Revise the correct formula and practise substitution questions using summary statistics.

Expand review

Physics

Physics student work example

Examiner comments

  • Part (a) is fully correct: the impulse calculation, force calculation, and unit are all accurate.

  • Part (b) is also correct. Your SUVAT method leads to a clear horizontal distance and a valid conclusion.

  • To improve exam technique, explicitly state your final comparison: 5.8 m is within 6.1 m, so the ball lands in the required distance.

Expand review

Chemistry

Chemistry student work example

Examiner comments

  • You correctly calculated the moles of Ce⁴⁺ and H₂O₂, then used the mole ratio accurately.

  • !

    The final ion should be Ce³⁺, not Ce⁵⁺. Revisit oxidation states and practise half-equation interpretation.

  • When writing final ionic formulae, check that the electron gain or loss matches the oxidation-state change.

Expand review

Biology

Biology student work example

Examiner comments

  • You gain credit for recognising that alternative splicing can produce different mRNA transcripts.

  • !

    The explanation is not clear enough about how exons are joined and how this changes the amino acid sequence.

  • Revise transcription, mRNA processing, introns/exons, and how different proteins can be produced from one gene.

Expand review

Further Math

Further Math student work example

Examiner comments

  • Parts (a)(i) and (a)(ii) receive credit for acceptable explanations.

  • !

    In part (b), an earlier algebraic error prevents a correct inequality solution.

  • Revise solving quadratic inequalities: identify roots accurately, sketch the sign pattern, and select the correct outside or middle interval.

Expand review
Built for schools

One complete assessment platform for teachers and students

Separate experiences for teachers and students make it easy to assign work, collect submissions, review feedback, and monitor performance across classes and departments.

Teacher platform

Teacher grading platform
Review submissions
Edit examiner comments
Track class statistics
Export reports

Student platform

Student mobile submission workflow
Scan handwritten work
Receive detailed feedback
Track improvement
Prepare independently
Real tangible benefits

More practice, less marking pressure, stronger A-Level outcomes

Give students more opportunities to improve while allowing teachers to focus on higher-value academic support instead of repetitive marking.

More
practice exams
Less
marking workload
Earlier
intervention
Higher
exam readiness

Physics department insight

Year 13

Students are consistently losing marks on momentum and impulse questions.

Recommended revision focus: conservation of momentum, impulse equations, and unit conversions.

Further Math insight

Vectors

Vector geometry questions are producing lower-than-average scores across two classes.

Recommended intervention: vector proofs, 3D geometry review, and coordinate methods.

Raise performance across the school

Use department-level statistics to improve revision planning, strengthen intervention, and support better final outcomes.

International opportunities

Prepare your students for success abroad

For schools with international ambitions, stronger exam preparation means students can approach university applications with clearer evidence of progress, stronger subject mastery, and more confidence in competitive academic routes.

Build a stronger academic profile before applications
Give departments clearer evidence of readiness
Support students aiming for selective universities
Help schools demonstrate measurable preparation quality
Study abroad preparation illustration

See Cortex Global in your school

Organise a free pilot and see how Cortex Global can help teachers save time, increase practice opportunities, and improve student outcomes.

Built for ambitious schools preparing students for top academic outcomes.